| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. The NEW PLAYER Experience - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Boring is just part of the game.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.05.02 03:13:15
|
2. Remove WCS - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm for getting rid of WCS along with WC scramblers and jammers.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.21 04:44:56
|
3. Tech 2 mobile micro jump unit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have a similar idea with an MJU. You can anchor it and as long as you don't activate it to jump through it you can scoop it. But as soon as you use it you cannot scoop it and it starts a charge timer. Once the charge timer runs out no more jumps...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.18 01:11:22
|
4. T3 destroyers, probably should not exist. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like T3 destroyers. They are very effective against Sleepers in WH Space.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.15 07:27:28
|
5. CCP have a look here plz. Got a reprocessing idé/fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How about just getting rid of the tax rate? If not then how about refining ALL of the ore and not leave crumbs like it does now. So fricken annoying.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.05 03:31:16
|
6. Mute "GONG" scanner sound please (d-scan) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It is a stupid sound, I think.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.04 02:37:44
|
7. [New Hull Suggestion] Bubble Ship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You could shut a gate down indefinitely...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.04.04 02:18:30
|
8. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bjorn Tyrson wrote: and what does that have anything to do with the topic at hand? multi-boxed ganking happens, but is much rarer than large fleets of independent gankers. are you suggesting that they all be banned as well? maybe ccp should in...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.26 20:11:37
|
9. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bjorn Tyrson wrote: Ronnie Rose wrote: Tic-toc, tic-toc. Changes are coming. lolwut. are you talking about the player built stargates? you really think this is going to prevent ganking in any way shape or form? in all likelyhood the...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.26 19:56:37
|
10. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ronnie Rose wrote: I hate being proven right, but I don't mind saying "I told you so" when correct. So, I'm for your continued play style even if to the point people start quitting (which could happen). Then CCP might do something about it. ...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.26 19:52:37
|
11. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jason Kusion wrote: I'm honored. A whole thread for me? You shouldn't have. Maybe you should get on my level and multibox your own 24 accounts. I don't know what stupid ship you lost, but I'm willing to bet if you had a 15 character support fl...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.26 19:38:51
|
12. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tic-toc, tic-toc. Changes are coming.
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.26 19:22:04
|
13. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Merin Ryskin wrote: Ronnie Rose wrote: I think it all goes back to the original problem with EVE and that is the gate system. Just what problem is that? Gates create choke points that players are forced to pass through, which means there ...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.25 16:04:27
|
14. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sarah Flynt wrote: Ronnie Rose wrote: So far, no one has really come up with reasons on why ganking with an excessive number of mutlboxed should be left unaddressed when I can give several on why it should be addressed. Actually you haven'...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.25 06:38:28
|
15. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Merin Ryskin wrote: Ronnie Rose wrote: what I see is exploiting a feature of this game beyond what I think CCP had originally intended. You see incorrectly. Both suicide ganking and the use of alts have been in the game since the beginni...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.25 05:59:48
|
16. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sarah Flynt wrote: I'd remove the "Gank" in the thread title because what you're describing is not exclusive to ganking but applies to all forms of multiboxing where most or all chars do the same activity. The actual problem is that many activi...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.25 03:16:46
|
17. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It's getting pretty out of control when players do it with 5 plus alts. I think its abusing an aspect of EVE its designers did not originally intend as part of the play experience. CCP should limit or restrict the practice and consider it a type ...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.24 01:13:06
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
It's official. The denominated PLEX will not be used to buy game times less than 30 days, so no cyno alts subbed for only hours at a time. AURUM balances less than a 1000 will be later converted to the new denominated PLEX after balances over a ...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.22 04:43:45
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: Sharcy wrote: Vulvona Ride-in wrote: My bet: montly plexing fees will explode ISK-wise! Maybe, but ATM only the wealthiest players can afford to trade in PLEX. With smaller units, more ppl can d...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.20 22:12:38
|
20. If I wanted to submit a new ship idea concept, can I do it? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, its now plain to me. Freighter hauling in this game is officially dead. People will be doing less and less of it because ganking has become so efficient. No way for the hauler to fend an attack off. CCP needs to do something or trade will ...
- by Ronnie Rose - at 2017.03.20 00:15:03
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |